Sunday, March 29, 2020

The Gulf Cooperation Council Economic Development

Introduction A strong, reliable, and sustainable economy is always the objective of every nation across the world. Globally, oil-producing countries have continuously played a significant role in the international economy.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The Gulf Cooperation Council Economic Development specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is a renowned political and economic union, specifically for the Arab states, mainly depending on production of oil for economic development (Coury and Chetan 1). The union has played a pivotal role in ensuring peace and economic expansion in countries covered by the union. Countries in the GCC have prospered in their economies through economic development strategies and successful transformation agendas. However, recent studies have indicated that some countries within the GCC are threatening their economic power by over depending on oil production as the chief financial resource. Since gas and oil are exhaustible resources, there is a growing need to diversify economies in the GCC (Looney 138). This paper investigates economic diversification in Qatar compared to Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Literature Review Countries in the Middle East have found oil to be the most precious natural resource, which truly has been quite imperative in enhancing their economic growth. For several decades, most countries in the Middle East have ranked top in the global oil production overview, with the majority of them depending on oil and natural gas wealth as major commodities for economic intensification. According to Shediac et al. (2), the Gulf Cooperation Council, including countries like Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the UAE are the largest oil-producing nations covering up to 80 per cent of the overall global oil production.Advertising Looking for research paper on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Oil in the GCC union started being the most appropriate economic booster since its discovery several decades ago, with the global wars revolving around oil production centres. However, oil boom within the GCC union seems to be losing its capacity gradually, which became eminent in years 1973-74. Conventionally, despite the triumph associated with the GCC as the greatest oil-producing nations, something seems to be going wrong. Previous studies have continuously indicated that the GCC economies have consistently been dependent on natural resources for growth by investing heavily on oil and gas production and leaving other non-oil sectors like agriculture, manufacturing, and hospitality overtly underutilised and underdeveloped (Basher 3). This aspect may best explain the reason behind economic predicaments that struck the GCC union during the global financial credit crunch and collapsed oil prices that laste d for decades from late 1980s to 1990s and even currently in the 21st century (Basher 2). With the existing socio-economic difficulties and financial problems worsened by unprecedented changes in the climatic conditions, concern has risen over the GCC and other oil-producing to change their propensity of depending on oil as the main economic commodity to other profitable sectors. Due to the prevailing pressure, several transformational changes are emerging within the GCC. The GGC union has developed several strategies to avert the pressure on oil. Some countries have almost completely shifted their economic activities from oil production to depending on public sector activities (Basher 3). Diversification within the GCC has been successful despite the fact that these countries face daunting challenges in diversifying, with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia diversifying through other potential sectors, including agriculture, manufacturing, and hospitality industries.Advertising We will wr ite a custom research paper sample on The Gulf Cooperation Council Economic Development specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In a bid to reduce its dependence on oil, Qatar has been investing heavily on natural gas production, which plays only a partial role in protecting the country’s unfavourable oil price fluctuations that affect national economic condition (Basher 4). Compared to Kuwait and Saudi Arabia who have diversified in almost all non-oil sectors, natural gas is barely enough to protect Qatar from depending on oil for economic support. Problem Statement Currently, nations within the GCC and others across the Middle East regions depending on oil production for economic growth are calling for enhancement of a diversified economy. Research noticed that the level of global oil production is gradually diminishing with climatic conditions and over-exploitation of natural resources exacerbating the situation. On noticing this, Middle Eastern governments, especially those under the GCC, have formulated economic development and transformation agendas (Shediac et al. 1). In this context, transformation agendas principally involved diversification of economy targeting to shift from depending on single economic commodity to well-diversified ones from a range of profitable sectors. Given that oil and natural gas revenues are exhaustible resources, the GCC governments have started substituting them with other considerable resources to enhance sustainable economy (Coury and Chetan 1).Advertising Looking for research paper on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Contrarily, Qatar has opted to shift to natural gas, which is still an exhaustible natural resource to avert the pressure on the oil consumption, making a null change. Methodology In a bid to provide empirical evidence needed to reinforce the argument in this study, this paper reviewed latest case studies conducted to examine the prevailing condition in the diversification of the economy within the GCC union. Two important case studies remained imperative to this study. A case study conducted by Basher (1-30), which concentrated on comparative analysis of dependence of oil in three countries, including Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, significantly proved the argument for this study. This study also undertook a quantitative assessment of the determinants of the business cycle synchronisation. The other empirical evidence involved case studies conducted by Shediac et al. (1-3), which principally examined diversification of the economy across the GCC economies. Both studies intended t o compare dependency of oil as the main economic commodity to others in a bid to distinguish which country among the three mostly depended on oil as the major economic commodity. In a bid to provide empirical evidence for the first study synchronicity or rather synchronisation method dominated the first study. Synchronicity, a term used to describe the experience between two that are actually unrelated, but normally coincide under circumstances in a meaningful manner. This study validated data produced concerning oil output and output from other non-oil sectors for the years ranging from Kuwait (1978-2007), Qatar (1980-2006), and Saudi Arabia (1968-2008). The study employed a nonparametric filter technique that usually estimates â€Å"trend component by minimising deviations from trend, subject to a predetermined smoothness of the resulting trend† (Basher 8). This aspect allows the estimation of synchronicity of oil output gap of the respective GCC economies. On the other han d, a case study of the GCC, the G7, and developed economies countries were significant in the study. Shediac et al. (2) confirm that this methodology involved measuring Gross Domestic Product (GDP) distribution across all sectors within the GCC, including agriculture and/or manufacturing to ascertain â€Å"concentration ratio† and â€Å"diversification quotient.† Results/Discussion First Argument By comparing the output ratio of oil and other non-oil sector products from the three GCC member countries, including Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, this paper managed to estimate the extend at which each country depended on oil products for economic growth. As synchronicity measure fluctuated over time, it was significant to include important events like, â€Å"the first oil crisis (1973-74), second oil crisis (1979-81), the Gulf war (1990-91) and the recent oil price shock (2005-2008); during all these episodes oil prices significantly increased† (Basher 10). This el ement primarily denoted how non-oil sectors depended on the oil sector with synchronicity being highly volatile and different across the three GCC countries. For Kuwait, the long run synchronicity measure indicated that non-oil sector’s dependence on the oil sector increased during a given period, thus suggested decreased diversification. Comparing to Qatar, the long-run trend of synchronicity was decreasing by then, although this aspect portrayed less meaningful economic diversification. The synchronicity trend for Saudi Arabia increased diffidently until mid-1990 before declining afterward. The estimated value of synchronicity in non-oil sectors in Qatar indicated that 53 per cent output of the non-oil sector revealed similar figures/percentage, which coincided with the output gap of the oil sector showing that the level of diversification within the non-oil sectors remained considerably weak. For the case of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, using different span of time indicated t hat the synchronicity measure between oil and non-oil sectors revealed only 45 per cent for Kuwait, demonstrating that the level of diversification in non-oil sectors had gradually been increasing (Basher 10). The case study yielded almost similar results in Saudi Arabia where the synchronicity measure for oil and non-oil sectors produced 46 per cent a trend that like Kuwait demonstrates reduced dependency on oil as the main economic commodity in the two countries. Basher affirms that this aspect revealed, â€Å"Qatar’s non-oil sector shows a slightly higher degree of dependence on the oil-sector relative to Kuwait and Saudi Arabia† (10). Second Argument In a bid to provide empirical evidence to this paper to prove the argument between oil dependency in Qatar and Kuwait together with Saudi Arabia, the study investigated the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) distribution across the three GCC economies, including Qatar, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. Following the case study condu cted by Shediac et al. (2), it became apparent that for a country to have a sustainable economy, several measures of diversification must reflect. Diversification is achievable, where the GDP reveals an even distribution across a variety of economic sectors (Srinivas 5). Therefore, to measure the contribution of GDP across sectors in the three countries, the study involved two important concepts, which are measurable and normally signify diversification of an economy. Shediac et al. affirms, â€Å"The concepts of economic concentration and diversification can be captured with the computation of the respective point estimators of concentration ratio and diversification quotient for the sample of studied economies† (3). Table 1: Economic Concentration and Economic diversification Latest Figure revealing data sample in the year 2005 Qatar Kuwait Saudi Arabia Economic Concentration (%) 39% 33% 28% Economic Diversification (%) 2.59% 3.0% 3.63% (Source: Shediac et al. 3) As demonstrated, the table only involved comparative figures for three GCC economies, viz. Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait. Research has demonstrated that economic concentration quotient and diversification quotient are significant determiners of economic diversification that predominantly depend on a range of economic sectors for economic development (Shediac et al. 3). Normally, â€Å"the concentration ratio measures a nation’s concentration in a given sector by taking the sum of squares of percent contribution to the GDP† (Shediac et al. 3). Countries with high economic concentration normally suffer from volatility in the economic growth and fluctuating economic cycles. In explainable manner, in the case of high economic concentration a country normally depends on vulnerable external events, including changes in the prices of dominant commodities a case eminent in Qatar’s economic concentration. From the source of the above data, from the three GCC countri es sampled for this study, Qatar ranks top in the economic concentration compared to all other GCC countries. However, comparing the figures for the three countries in the GCC economies as used in this study, Qatar recorded highest economic concentration of 39 per cent, followed relatively close by Kuwait with about 33 per cent and finally Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with 28 per cent. The essence of these figures is to provide an overview of how high concentration correlates with economic diversification where high economic concentration reveals high reliance of economic activity in the three GCC countries on the oil and gas sector. Normally, higher economic concentration depicts low diversification in economical terms. Based on the above table, Shediac et al. note, â€Å"Qatar tops amid the three GCC countries with highest concentrations in terms of sector contribution to GDP and thus, exhibits the lowest diversification scores† (3). According to studies conducted to investigate the contribution of non-oil sectors to the GDPs across the three GCC nations, comparative analysis revealed that Qatar depends considerably high on oil than both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Both studies conducted by Basher (15) and Shediac et al. (6) demonstrate that Qatar has heavily invested on oil than other sectors. Screening through sectors like manufacturing and agriculture in the three GCC countries, Shediac et al. (7) concluded that the oil industry in Qatar is relatively highly depended by other sectors that in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, which is an evidence to demonstrate how Qatar heavily relies on oil than the other two countries. Srinivas (11) postulates that the monopolised oil production sector in Qatar has forced researchers to cite this element as the main cause of lack of diversification in the country, thus exposing it to dangerous events like global price fluctuations. Conclusion Based on the empirical evidence provided by the two case studies to prove the argument f or this study, it is evident that Qatar has continuously depended on oil production as compared to Kuwait and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Comparing figures on the economic concentration and economic diversification of the three GCC countries, Qatar ranks top in the economic concentration and the lowest diversification quotient, whereby the higher the economic concentration the lower the diversification in economic terms (Shediac et al. 3). On the other hand, Basher (15) used the synchronisation technique, where synchronicity referred to similar situations coincided with each other. As both oil and natural gas revenues are exhaustible, all GCC nations, especially Qatar, should be cautious on diversification. Works Cited Basher, Syed 2010, Has the Non-oil Sector Decoupled from Oil Sector? A Case Study of Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. PDF File. Web. Coury, Tarek, and Dave Chetan 2009, Oil, Labour Markets, and Economic Diversification in the GCC: An Empirical Assessment. PDF File . Web. Looney Robert. â€Å"The Gulf Co-operation councils caution approach to economic integration.† Journal of Economic Cooperation 24.3 (2003): 137-160. Print. Shediac, Richard, Rabih Abouchakra, Chadi Moujaes, and Ramsay Mazen 2008, Economic Diversification: The Road to Sustainable Development. Web. Srinivas, Kastoori. â€Å"Economic Development of GCC Countries: Risks and Challenges: An Overview.† Indian Journal of Business Review 4.1 (2011): 1-14. Print. This research paper on The Gulf Cooperation Council Economic Development was written and submitted by user Griffin Hurst to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Saturday, March 7, 2020

Pliny Trajan Correspondence Essay Example

Pliny Trajan Correspondence Essay Example Pliny Trajan Correspondence Essay Pliny Trajan Correspondence Essay Plink explained to Trojan that in he past he had asked the people he came across whether they were Christians, and if they said they were Christians he would threaten them with punishment and ask them twice more whether they were Christian, and if they agreed every time he would send them for execution (Roman law does not accept a single confession as proof of crime). He would also send them to be executed if they were stubborn, as obstinacy and unbending perversity deserve to be punished. If there were Roman citizens Plink deemed to be insane he noted them down to be sent to Rome. Roman citizens had an advantage over others at this time, as if you were ordered to be executed you could appeal to the Emperor but if this appeal failed and you did have to be executed it would be by beheading, not crucifixion as per the other accused. Before long, Plink was handed a piece of unsigned paper that revealed the names of many Christians. When he met some of the people named on this list they told him they werent Christians, and proved this by reciting a prayer to the gods, made supplication with incense and wine to your statue, and moreover cursed Christ as Plink had heard that true Christians could not do his and refused to. Thus Plink had a dilemma on his hand -? he didnt know what to do, as the piece of paper he had been handed proved untrue (although some people said they had been Christians in previous years but had realized the error of their ways, so Plink let them leave peacefully after they worshipped Tartans statue and cursed Christ). These unsigned letters that he was handed allow us to have an insight in the early Church habits, as the repented earlier Christians told Plink what they used to do. They told Plink that Christians assembled on a fixed day (which we assume is Sunday, but we eave no proof) before day light to pray to God, to take an oath to not commit crime, theft, robbery or adultery, not to break their word and not to deny a deposit when demanded. They then departed and met again to eat ordinary but harmless food (I. E. He Christians were not eating human flesh as was common folklore). Plink was confused as to what to do he had not experienced this before and he needed advice on what to do. To gain more information on Christians, he asked 2 maid-servants how far this Christian tale was true, however he discovered nothing from them. They said it was a perverse and extravagant superstition. He concluded that the matter was worth deliberation. Christianity was having a huge effect on Bathing, where Pl ink was sent. Plink writes in his letter All ages and every rank, and also of both sexes are brought into present or future danger. The contagion of that superstition has penetrated not the cities only, but the villages and country; yet it seems possible to stop it and set it right. At any rate it is certain enough that the almost deserted temples begin to be resorted to, that long and issued ceremonies of religion are restored, and that fodder for victims finds a market (the farmers who brought into the various markets food for the temple victims Were in danger Of being ruined (Hardy) I. . Christianity Was bad for business at the time), whereas buyers till now were very few. We can gather from this that the superstition of Christianity was leaving Pagan temples deserted, hence clearly the Church had expanded noticeably and was impacting social and economic life in the province. Banks also says Plink however informs the emperor that his actions have reversed this trend. Trojan responds to Plink v ery bluntly, which is ironic compared to Plinks lengthy letter. He says Plink took the right course of action, but there is no laid no rule involving something like a set form of procedure. Trojan does give Plink some advice in case he gets into the same situation again. He says they (Christians) are not to be sought out; but if they are accused and convicted, they must be punished Papers, however, which are presented unsigned out not to be admitted in any charge, for they are a very bad example and unworthy of our time. Terrestrial concluded what a decision, owe hopelessly entangled! He says they must not be ferreted out, implying they are innocent; he orders them to be punished, implying they are guilty. He spares them and rages against them, he pretends not to see and punishes. Bruce also concludes Entangled as the ruling was, Trojan no doubt thought it was the most reasonable and expedient course in the circumstances. J Stevenson that Tartans belief that Christians were both innocent and guilty is sensible and a pragmatic decision, avoiding groundless accusations on one hand, but retaining sanctions if necessary on the other.